Drawing as a fundamental catalyst in the development of creativity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62305/alcon.v16i2.903Keywords:
analytical drawing; creativity; neuroeducation; divergent thinking; visual cognitionAbstract
This study examines the correlation between deliberate drawing practice and increased creative abilities in individuals in education. Often relegated to a merely aesthetic or childish activity, drawing is proposed here as a complex cognitive tool that activates neural networks associated with problem-solving and innovation. Through a mixed-methods approach combining psychometric tests of divergent thinking with qualitative analysis of visual sketchbooks, the research demonstrates that drawing fosters cognitive flexibility and originality. The results suggest that the curricular integration of drawing, not as a final art form but as a thought process, is crucial for the development of transversal skills in the 21st century. And it is concluded that: Evidence suggests that drawing should not be limited to the arts. Its capacity to enhance originality and elaboration makes it an essential pedagogical tool for learning. The practice of drawing reduces psychological barriers to creativity (fear of making mistakes), fostering a growth and experimentation mindset. The development of creativity through drawing is based on improving observation and synthesis skills, cognitive abilities necessary for innovation. Therefore, the integration of "visual thinking labs" into general curricula is recommended, as well as the promotion of analog drawing as a precursor to the use of digital tools.
Downloads
References
Chamberlain, R., McManus, I. C., & Brunswick, N. (2022). The impact of artistic training on cognitive flexibility and brain plasticity: A voxel-based morphometry study. NeuroImage, 248, 118850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118850
Chatterjee, A., & Vartanian, O. (2020). Brain, beauty, and art: Essays bringing neuroaesthetics into focus. Oxford University Press.
Fernández-Cárdenas, J. M., & Piña-Gómez, L. (2023). Visual thinking strategies in higher education: Enhancing creativity and critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47, 101213.
Hetland, L., Winner, E., Veenema, S., & Sheridan, K. M. (2022). Studio thinking 3: The real benefits of visual arts education. Teachers College Press.
Kaimal, G., Ayaz, H., & Herres, J. (2020). Functional near-infrared spectroscopy assessment of reward perception based on visual self-expression. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 69, 101655.
Kantrowitz, A. (2021). Drawn to see: Drawing as an ethnographic method. Routledge.
Li, Y., & Chen, S. (2023). Digital vs. traditional drawing: A comparative study of creative flow and outcome in design education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33(2), 445-462.
Mangen, A., & Velay, J. L. (2021). Haptic dissonance in digital drawing: Implications for cognitive processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 642879.
Sousa, D. A., & Pilecki, T. (2023). From STEM to STEAM: Brain-compatible strategies and lessons that integrate the arts. Corwin Press.
Yaniv, D., & Tsamir, G. (2024). The silence of the pen: Mindfulness, drawing, and the suppression of the Default Mode Network. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, Advan
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Scientific Journal of Educational Innovation and Current Society "ALCON". ISSN 2960-8473

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




