Precision and truthfulness of analytes in clinical biochemistry of the “JD” clinical laboratory, El Carmen 2024

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62305/biosana.v5i3.601

Keywords:

analytical precisión; veracity; clinical biochemistry; quality control; CLSI EP15-A3; clinical laboratory

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the accuracy and precision of clinical biochemistry analytes (glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides, uric acid, urea, and creatinine) at the "JD" clinical laboratory in El Carmen Canton, applying the CLSI EP15-A3 protocol. Twenty-five measurements per control level were performed over five consecutive days, assessing repeatability, intra-laboratory variability, and bias against the manufacturer's reference values. The results showed that glucose, cholesterol, uric acid, and urea met analytical quality standards at all levels. In contrast, the triglyceride analyte presented high bias in the normal control, while creatinine showed critically poor accuracy at the pathological level. These findings lead to the conclusion that, while the laboratory maintains an acceptable overall level of reliability, urgent corrective actions are required for the aforementioned analytes. The study highlights the importance of applying international validation protocols as a tool to ensure clinically safe and reliable results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Gimenez JM, Bonetto A, Abiega C, Lujan PR. Evaluación de estrategias para la gestión de calidad en laboratorios clínicos: análisis de modo y efecto de fallo e indicador Budget Error. Revista Bioquímica y Patología Clínica. 2025;89(1).

Hernández ÁG. Principios de bioquímica clínica y patología molecular: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2019.

Valladares MdJG, Villacreses WAL. Gestión de procesos: importancia y frecuencia de los programas de controles de calidad en el laboratorio clínico. Polo del Conocimiento: Revista científico-profesional. 2023;8(4):117-41.

ISO. ISO 15189:2022 . Medical laboratories — Requirements for quality and competence. International Organization for Standardization 2022 [Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/76677.html.

Agily A, Khalawy A, Homadi AY, Shehri A, Saleh A, Harbi A, et al. Strategies for Effective Medical Laboratory Management: A Comprehensive Guide. International Journal. 2022;10(6).

Gammie AJ, Lopez JB, Scott S. Imperative: reducing the environmental impact of clinical laboratories. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM). 2023;61(4):634-7.

Hernández-Sampieri R, Mendoza C. Metodología de la investigación: las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. Mcgraw-hill México; 2020.

Alban GPG, Arguello AEV, Molina NEC. Metodologías de investigación educativa (descriptivas, experimentales, participativas, y de investigación-acción). Recimundo. 2020;4(3):163-73.

Vílchez Rodríguez A, González Cantó J, Esteve Poblador S, Valldecabres Ortiz C, Estela Burriel PL. Precision and trueness verification study of an Atellica system. Advances in Laboratory Medicine/Avances en Medicina de Laboratorio. 2020;1(4):20200096.

Compton CC, Robb JA, Anderson MW, Berry AB, Birdsong GG, Bloom KJ, et al. Preanalytics and precision pathology: pathology practices to ensure molecular integrity of cancer patient biospecimens for precision medicine. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine. 2019;143(11):1346-63.

Castro JJZ, Arteaga EAM, Villacreces WAL. Precisión del tamizaje glucosa capilar y venosa en los estudiantes de la carrera de laboratorio clínico de la Universidad Estatal del Sur de Manabí. Revista Científica de Salud BIOSANA. 2025;5(2):169-90.

Published

2025-05-14

How to Cite

Loor Sabando, D. G. ., & Lino Villacreses, W. A. (2025). Precision and truthfulness of analytes in clinical biochemistry of the “JD” clinical laboratory, El Carmen 2024 . BIOSANA Health Scientific Journal. ISSN 2960-8481, 5(3), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.62305/biosana.v5i3.601

Issue

Section

Artículos