Clil method to teach academic vocabulary
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62305/alcon.v6i1.980Keywords:
CLIL, integrated learning, academic vocabulary, language teaching, EFLAbstract
Developing academic vocabulary remains a challenge for most university students learning English as a second or foreign language, particularly in regions where traditional methodologies emphasize the isolated teaching of grammar and vocabulary. In response to this issue, the study investigated the potential of the Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) approach to support the acquisition of academic vocabulary among university students. The research was conducted with 31fourth-cycle students enrolled in the Pedagogy of National and Foreign Languages at the Technical University of Cotopaxi. It adopted a quantitative research design, supported by qualitative data, within an exploratory, diagnostic, and descriptive framework. Instruments for data collection included an academic vocabulary pre-test and post-test, writing and speaking rubrics, and a revised observation guide for systematic classroom observation during a CLIL-based instructional unit. Quantitative findings showed statistically significant improvements in students’ academic vocabulary knowledge, as validated by higher post-test scores and reduced score variation, as well as progression from CEFR elementary levels (A1 and A2) toward two upper intermediate levels (B1 and B2). Qualitative findings further indicated positive development in students’ use of academic vocabulary in written and oral assignments, along with increased participation, self-confidence and motivation in classroom activities. These results suggest that the combination of content and language instructions within a single pedagogical framework fosters meaningful learning contexts that promote the retention and functional use of vocabulary. The study concludes that CLIL constitutes an effective methodology for developing academic vocabulary in EFL settings.
Downloads
References
BinSaran, A. A. (2021). Use of content and language integrated learning for teaching reading skills in Saudi universities. English Language Teaching, 14(8), 1–12. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1309578.pdf
Brooks, G., Clenton, J., & Fraser, S. (2023). Exploring the Importance of vocabulary for English as an additional language learners' reading comprehension. In EAL Research for the Classroom (pp. 35-58). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003274889-5/exploring-importance-vocabulary-english-additional-language-learners-reading-comprehension-gavin-brooks-jon-clenton-simon-fraser
DeLuca, C., Lapointe-McEwan, D., & Luhanga, U. (2024). CLIL teachers’ assessment literacy: A scoping review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 135, 104150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104150
Escalante Gamazo, M. C., Arias Quinga, E. P., & Sulca Guale, X. (2023). Promote vocabulary learning in context through the CLIL methodology. Revista DATEH, 14(2), 66–78. https://investigacion.utc.edu.ec/index.php/dateh/article/view/685
Gao, Y., & Wang, Y. (2025). Effects of content and language integrated learning on secondary students’ content learning: A meta-analysis. System, 116, 103580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103580
Hidalgo , D. R., & Ortega-Sánchez, D. (2023). CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) Methodological Approach in the Bilingual Classroom: A Systematic Review1. International Journal of Instruction, 16(3), 915–934. Retrieved from https://e-iji.net/ats/index.php/pub/article/view/114
Hidalgo, C., & Ortega-Sánchez, D. (2023). Effects of content and language integrated learning on academic vocabulary development and learner motivation in higher education. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 14(2), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1402.08
Hidayat, D. N., Fitriah, Mahlil, & Mason, J. (2023). Factors Impacting English Teachers’ Creativity in Teaching English as a Foreign Language in Indonesia. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(1), 155-173. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i1.26145
Khalilova , K. (2023). ACADEMIC VOCABULARY: HOW TO TEACH AND STUDY IT. Modern Science and Research, 2(9), 79–83. Retrieved from https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/science-research/article/view/23902
Khalilova, N. (2023). Traditional versus contextualized vocabulary instruction in EFL classrooms: Implications for long-term retention. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 12(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.12n.1p.33
Kuravska, N., & Bilyanska, I. (2023). Increasing the effectiveness of foreign language learning through content-language integrated learning (CLIL). Journal of the Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University. Philology , (10), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.15330/jpnuphil.10.38-46
Kuravska, N., & Bilyanska, O. (2023). Integrating academic vocabulary through CLIL: A learner-centered approach in tertiary education. TESOL Quarterly, 57(1), 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3175
Lei, L., & Liu, D. (2021). Vocabulary knowledge and academic English proficiency among EFL learners at the tertiary level. System, 97, 102432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102432
Peizhen Lyu. (2022). How does Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Influence University Students’ English Acquisition? A Systematic Literature Review. Research and Advances in Education, 1(6), 28–37. Retrieved from https://www.paradigmpress.org/rae/article/view/355
Reynaert, B. (2024). Effect of language learning strategies on vocabulary development in CLIL. Porta Linguarum An International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, (41), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi41.27217
Sarabia Oñate, M. A. (2021). CLIL approach for the development of English vocabulary among teenagers. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador. https://repositorio.puce.edu.ec/handle/123456789/9395
Shrestha, S., Laudari, S., & Gnawali, L. (2023). Exploratory action research: Experiences of Nepalese EFL teachers. ELT Journal: an international journal for teachers of English to speakers of other languages, 77(4), 407-415. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccac029
Shykun, A. (2023). Content and language integrated learning: Enhancing language acquisition and content understanding. International Science Journal of Education & Linguistics, 2(3), 45–56. https://isg-journal.com/isjel/article/view/455
Tovar, R. (2017). Vocabulary knowledge in the production of written texts: a case study on EFL language learners. Revista Tecnológica - ESPOL, 30(3), 89-1-5. https://rte.espol.edu.ec/index.php/tecnologica/article/view/628
Tovar, R., & Tapia, J. (2019). Learning factors in a foreign-language classroom context. REDIPE, 8(7), 113-127 https://doi.org/10.36260/rbr.v8i7.783
Zhi, L., & Wang, Y. (2023). Academic lexical competence of EFL university students: Challenges and pedagogical implications. Asian EFL Journal, 27(3), 112–129. https://www.asian-efl-journal.com
Zhi, R., & Wang, Y. (2023). English as a foreign language teachers’ professional success, loving pedagogy and creativity: A structural equation modeling approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, 101370. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1871187123001384
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Scientific Journal of Educational Innovation and Current Society "ALCON". ISSN 2960-8473

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




